Trump administration asks Supreme Court to let revised travel ban take effect

Thursday the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to let the revised travel ban take effect. The administration filed two emergency applications with the nine Court justices seeking to block two lower court rulings that blocked President Trump’s executive order.

In the filing, the Justice Department argued that the appeals court in Richmond, Va. made several mistakes in ruling against Trump’s travel order. Sarah Isgur Flores, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said the ban is lawful.

The Justice Department is “confident that President Trump’s executive order is well within his lawful authority to keep the nation safe and protect our communities from terrorism,” Flores said. “The president is not required to admit people from countries that sponsor or shelter terrorism, until he determines that they can be properly vetted and do not pose a security risk to the United States.”

The order barred entry for people from six Muslim majority nations, including Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for 90 days while the U.S. implements stricter visa screenings.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals called the national security concerns an after-the-fact justification for a policy that was “intended to bar Muslims from this country.”

Rights groups that have been fighting the policy in the courts said the justices should not allow the travel and refugee bans to take effect.

“Again and again, our nation’s courts have found that President Trump’s Muslim ban is unconstitutional. We will continue to defend our plaintiffs’ right to live free from fear of discriminatory treatment by the federal government,” said Karen Tumlin, legal director of the National Immigration Law Center.

Trump signed his first executive order on travel a week after he took office in January. It applied to travelers from the six countries as well as Iraq and took effect immediately, causing chaos and panic at airports as the Homeland Security Department scrambled to figure out who the order covered and how it was to be implemented.

A federal judge blocked it eight days later, an order that was upheld by a 9th Circuit panel. Rather than pursue an appeal, the administration said it would revise the policy.

In March, Trump issued a narrower order, but federal courts that have examined it so far have blocked it as well.



  1. janice

    Sounds As if the Left Is Bucking Presidential Executive Order’s, Folk’s! If A President, Trump Deem’s Necessary To The Best Interest’s Of All American’s Safety And Security; According To The Constitution Of USA, Can Enact To The Best Of His Ability, A Ban On Any Countries Who Hover Terrorist Act’s Of Terrorism, From Never, Ever Entering USA! Anyone Going Against Presidential Executive Order’s, Are Under Statute Prosecutable Under Law-Laws And Deemed To Be A Danger To Society And USA! Put Into Prison!

  2. janice

    And It Should Take Effect More Than Ever, Folk’s! Before We-USA End Up Like The UK! Meaning Another Terror Attack Hit Three Different Places Today In The UK! People Dead And Severely Injured! To Start With The UK Took In Muslim Immigrants.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: