What’s More Dangerous — DNC Hack or Criminality It Exposed?
Yeah, it’s a different set of rules for Demonrats, they believe they are above the law. First, it was the FBI and Director James Comey that were responsible for Hillary Clinton’s failed presidential campaign. Then, there was Green Party candidate Jill Stein claiming voter fraud and voter hacking, which turned out to be a farce.
But now, the CIA has assessed through “circumstantial evidence” that Russia was responsible for hacking into the Democratic National Committee’s emails and providing those emails to WikiLeaks, which released them to the public.
The claim is that Russia did so in an attempt to influence the election. After 24 hours of this latest rambling, we’re now learning that the FBI doesn’t necessarily agree with the CIA, and worse, that the top overseers of the U.S. intelligence community have not embraced a CIA assessment.
As you can see folks, the CIA has just proven how political they’ve become.
But what We the People, want to know, is how the CIA came to this conclusion. What evidence do they have that Russia was behind this?
Did Russia know the emails would expose clear-cut criminality by Secretary Clinton and her family, and her former staff as it relates to using her office to solicit tens of millions of dollars from foreign heads of state, for her family’s foundation?
There was also clear evidence, that Clinton’s campaign staff colluded with CNN journalists prior to her debate with Donald Trump in order to assist her in the debate and the election.
Lastly, did they also know that Clinton’s campaign staff and the DNC colluded to undermine and destroy the presidential campaign of Bernie Sanders?